Wednesday, February 28, 2018

4 Effective Tips to Create Customers for Life with the Perfect Onboard Messaging Sequence

The very beginning of any relationship is awkward.

Do you think your customers feel that way about the beginning of their relationship with you?

Because if they do, that’s bad. It’s a severe threat to your business!

It’s kind of like being on time for a party. Everyone’s feeling things out, sizing up the room, and trying to find a cozy place to gel while the party gets going. At least, that’s if things go smoothly.

Other times it’s more like those middle school dance parties where there are too many chaperones, and no one knows what to do.

So you stand around awkwardly until your mom picks you up.

As the saying goes, the “seeds of churn are planted early.“ Your customer onboarding experience will determine the overall quality and longevity of your business relationship.

But how do you create the perfect onboarding experience?

And better yet, how do you make it seem like you’re not overly market-ey?

Because a relationship should feel natural. It should be guidance and friendship instead of skywriting that says BUY NOW.

I know you get what I’m saying because you’ve probably been on both sides of that coin.

So I want to knuckle down in this post and show you how to avoid the early missteps and build bridges that will last a lifetime.

Your brand will flourish, your business will grow, and you might even feel a little more fulfillment in the connections you make.

I’m going to show you how to build the perfect onboard messaging sequence.

But first, let’s talk about why you should even pay attention to your onboarding in the first place.

Why you should care about your onboarding experience

Onboarding is a broad term.

It’s not a single instance you can point to and say “this is onboarding,” because it’s describing an entire process.

It’s the journey a customer takes from the first click to their first success.

GrooveHQ conveys it well with a simple graph:

They’ve turned “first click” into “acquisition,” but the point is the same.

We’re specifically focusing on the beginning of the customer relationship, and we’re not just doing to call it a “sales thing.”

Anyone can do this and do it well.

One of the other terms you’ll hear thrown around when talking about onboarding is the concept of “churn.”

You’ve already heard me mention it, but I want to dig a little deeper before we progress.

Churn is synonymous with problems.

Let’s compare it to noticing one week into a new relationship that your girlfriend is hiding her phone.

The seeds of doubt – or of churn – are planted early.

This isn’t a new concept either.

The most significant problems usually start early in the process, and the same is true for customer relationships.

Where onboarding plays such a vital role is that the opposite of everything I just said is also true.

Seeds of churn can be planted early, but so are the seeds of success, as this anecdote from Kahuna Accounting conveys.

In just 12 months, they went from $0 to $480k annually.

How did they accomplish that?

They focused on their onboarding experience!

I’ll talk a little more about the specifics of what they did in a minute, but I want to wrap up our discussion about onboarding first.

According to Tallyfy, your onboarding experience should seek to answer two questions:

  1. Have you successfully introduced your new client to your business and addressed all their questions and concerns early on?
  2. Have you gathered information on your client so you have insight into what products and services would benefit them?

Let’s unwrap these two thoughts by looking at what AppCues did with their client Canva’s onboarding sequence.

How do they go about introducing themselves and addressing concerns?

For starters, they looked for growth opportunities and provided the organization with a way to gather data.

As you’ll see in the image below, there’s a link to a quick two-minute survey that they send in the welcome email.

I want to repeat that: they put it in the welcome email.

Why? Because they wanted to know if they were doing everything they could to satisfy their new customers.

Once their data confirmed that Canva knew their user base and provided for their needs, they decided to start forming hypotheses and experimenting.

They revamped their onboarding sequence so that customers would see this upon arrival:

What were the results? They had a 10% increase in activation for this particular project type.

So you see that finding the right approach to take your client from acquisition to success is the onboarding sequence.

You’ll address their concerns and find new ways to benefit them.

I want to make one final point about customer onboarding, in case there’s any doubt in your mind about its importance.

Way back in 2000, Harvard Business School published a fascinating study that revealed one very telling fact:

In the long term, it’s more profitable to retain old customers than win new ones.

This is old-school knowledge, but it’s relevant nonetheless.

Retention has been proven time and again to be a cheaper and more profitable route than acquiring new customers.

And if the future of your relationships starts at its’ inception, then I hope you’re paying attention to what comes next.

1. Interview the Right People

To send the right message, you have to know what your audience wants to hear.

And you need to be able to do it across any industry, no matter the pain points.

I want to go back to our example from Kahuna Accounting for a moment, because what they did stands out as an excellent example of this approach.

Sixteen Ventures shared their story in a podcast, but here’s the gist of it:

They started with the assumption that their customers knew more than they did.

So to test that assumption, they interviewed anyone and everyone who was in their targeted niche.

They interviewed the ideal clients.

They questioned the clients you wouldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole.

They even found thought leaders and bloggers to talk to who would share their experiences.

By going incredibly narrow and capitalizing on their niche, they found that the world seemed to get smaller.

However, the interviews gave them direction. All of their marketing was poured into their findings.

They learned to speak their language and built a customer landing page to push their campaign.

They even wrote a whitepaper based on the information from the interviews.

Strategic ads, guest blogs, and collaborations abounded.

One year later, they’d gone from $0 to $480k. All because of some interviews.

You don’t always have the opportunity to ask questions in person though, and it’s not always about setting up interviews anyways.

Some services, like Shopify, re-engage with their target audience by reminding them of their pocketbook:

You may have set up a store with them, but they know the reason you’re using their platform is that you want to make money.

You can’t make money if your card isn’t connected.

So they use messaging like this to draw you back in.

They build a trust-oriented relationship that is beneficial for you and them, but they don’t lead with that.

They simply remind you that you can make more money. Cool idea, right?

Here’s another example from fashion designer Paul Smith’s brand:

This is a really simple approach, but it falls in line with getting to know your customer better.

By asking newcomers or recent purchasers to set up a profile, they’re not only learning more about who they sell to, but they’re also deepening the impact of their brand.

Interview or no interview, these processes fall under the umbrella of a process called Customer Development.

Customer Development is a method of finding and qualifying the right market for your business. That’s essentially what Kahuna Accounting did.

The idea is to build a product around elements that solve your customers’ needs, then find the right ways to convert customers.

All of this is ideally accomplished while organizing your methods so that your business is scalable, too.

And this is a critical issue too because it’s a process by which you can answer the question “Is what I’m doing truly needed?” before you invest your time and money into an endeavor that will ultimately fail.

But that’s ultimately why interviews are so important, even when we get interview anxiety or feel awkward about it.

It’s a make-or-break situation, not an optional convenience.

I absolutely love CustomerDevLab’s advice for interviews:

  1. Crawl
  2. Walk
  3. Run

It’s a little tongue-in-cheek, but it’s also spot on.

The process of escalating your interviews from partners to family and friends and then finally on to customers makes sense.

It provides a gradual and honest understanding of the environment around your businesses.

I highly recommend it.

If you want more guides and resources for Customer Development, I highly recommend you check out this compilation of 26 resources we put together.

2. Find out where your funnel is leaking

After you’ve done your interviews, it’s time to take a look inside your boat. Metaphorically speaking, that is.

What I mean is that you need to take a long, hard look at your sales funnel and find where people are falling out.

It doesn’t matter if it’s shortly after acquisition or just before the sale, knowing where and why your leads are dropping out will give you the knowledge to fix it.

Do you see the drop off between the first and second stages in the image above?

That shouldn’t happen!

It’s quite apparent that this part of the funnel has the most significant pain points, which means it deserves the most attention.

And before you get carried away and think that a massive drop like that is a failure, it’s not.

That’s an opportunity.

So how can you cash in on an opportunity like this?

It could be a number of things, but I’ll start with the issue we’ve been addressing all along: relationships.

It’s entirely plausible that a drop like this could mean you’re either asking for something too soon or not building enough trust.

Instapage gave some great advice on how you can also focus on relationships to increase conversion rates in your funnel. They recommend:

  • Show people they have a problem.
  • Define success on their terms.
  • Give leads more access to your product.
  • Show your leads more attention and treat them like people
  • Keep your cool through mistakes and churn.

If you’re human, that probably sounds a bit scary.

I know the first time I heard it I was a bit concerned.

You want me to tell people they have a problem but let them decide what success looks like?

I get that reaction! You’re putting so much power into your customer’s hands, but it pays to remember the Trust Equation here:

You’re attempting to build credibility, reliability, and intimacy to gain the unwavering trust of your customer.

Trust is what leads to relationships, and relationships lead to sales and retention. It’s all one big cycle that you have to trust.

Ironic, I know.

So focus on relationships first. And keep in mind that it’s also possible your problems have nothing to do with relationships.

Now, wait.

I just told you that you’re losing leads because of relationships, but then backed off and said you might not be losing leads because of relationships?

I know, it’s confusing. But I’m allowing for the possibility that you’re doing a great job and still have a leaky funnel. That’s entirely possible!

For example, you could be losing up to 53% of your landing page’s visitors just because of long load times.

Instapage recently shared that even a seven-second difference doubles the likelihood that a visitor won’t even stay around long enough to view your offer.

That means your onboarding is dead before it starts!

So the point here is though that ultimately you’ll only know where the holes in your funnel are if you’re paying attention.

And the even bigger truth is that you’ll only ever fix them if you are in tune with your customer relationships.

3. Check in regularly

Once you’ve patched up your funnel, you need to look a little deeper into the regularity of your messaging.

It’s the perfect opportunity to use all those tips on email onboarding you’ve been reading.

You’ll see a lot of elements from SparkPage’s Anatomy of a Perfect Email Onboarding Flow here.

Communication with proper timing and perfect messaging will help push customers through your onboarding experience to their first success.

But that communication is a delicate balancing act that asks one all-important question:

How do you strike the perfect chord of helpful contact without providing too much or too little?

You don’t want to go ghost go on your new client while they’re trying to figure out your service.

You also don’t want to be spammy.

It’s the problem of copywriters and email marketers everywhere.

To help you get an idea of what timely and helpful content looks like, I want to take a leaf out of Grammarly’s book.

If you’re not familiar with Grammarly, it’s an online editorial tool used by millions of writers to help double check for errors before they get called out by Reddit.

I recently started a free trial with them. I then upgraded because I was impressed with the product and the onboarding experience.

Shortly after signing up, I got this friendly and helpful welcome:

They just wanted to let me know what I could immediately expect from their service. I poked around and enjoyed the interface, and even plugged in an article I’d written to test it out.

After a few days of trying their product religiously (I admit I was in love), Grammarly then provided some subtle nudging about the perks of their paid product.

I could get added features that would improve my writing even more?

Uh, yes.

The next day, the conversation continued with them telling me about some of the improvements they had made since they began their editorial journey.

As a member of their target market, they had me. I was enthralled.

Better yet, I was excited when seven days after starting I received a gamified report card of my weekly writing.

I was more productive than 97% of Grammarly writers?

You’ve no idea how proud that made me, even though I didn’t have any inclination about the size of their user base.

They showed me my first success, and it felt great.

So I kept using the free service, and Grammarly kept hitting me up.

They checked in from time to time to make sure I was doing okay.

Of course with a subtle push toward the heightened capabilities of their paid product.

They even sent me an email asking for a review:

Pretty soon I couldn’t help it.

The service was excellent, and I wanted more capabilities to help me improve my writing style, so I pulled out my credit card.

As soon as I signed up for their service, I was ushered to their service team to make sure there were zero issues with my transition.

It was a dream come true.

By staying in touch, anticipating my needs, and following through on the fulfillment, Grammarly created an onboarding experience that I just couldn’t resist.

I still use their services and have even recommended it to some of my other writer friends.

But just think of all the elements that kept me engaged in their brand.
The weekly progress reports kept me excited to write.
Asking for feedback kept them honest.

And immediately hooking me up with support made sure that my movement to a more powerful service went perfectly.

The power of knowing your audience and appropriately timing your messages can take any user from acquisition to success.

If your onboarding sequence isn’t regular and exciting enough to cause a stir around your brand, it’s time to go back to the drawing board.

4. Utilize Chat and Messaging

I want to stay on the topic of communication for one more moment because it doesn’t have to just be via email or in person.

You have the option to engage in real time communication with your leads and customers that can boost retention and keep people happy with your services.

According to Sonar, you can make a strong first impression by utilizing SMS onboarding as a creative way to connect with new clients.

Look at how a service like DrinkEasy does it:

You see how they take the opportunity to get to know their customer and explain their service.

They ask what drinks the client likes, lay out the process, and even ask for a way to personalize the process.

If the customer has any questions or requests, they’re invited to ask.

Once they start to push their product, the conversation continues on the same text chain.

Everything works in context, and it’s a beautiful sight to behold.

They use SMS to share their product findings and a few interesting facts.

You then have the option to buy, pass, or request something else. All via text. No email, no phone calls, and no in-person awkwardness.

Another option that will let you streamline your communication and decrease the number of man hours involved is a Chatbot.

Early versions, like Cleverbot, made people doubt the validity of using tools like this at first.

I didn’t screencap this on Christmas.

But Chatbots aren’t quite the same. Cleverbot actually “learns” from people.

A good Chatbot can provide resources and quick answers in an onboarding process that don’t end up like the example above.

Take Facebook’s bots. They can do some amazing work on their platform.

For example, you can now have a bot crawl for relevant content and actually post it to a Group or Page:

Those same bots can also recommend pieces to your audience by directly tagging them in a comment below the post.

It’s exactly like when you want to share content with a friend, but automated.

And you can also set up pre-scripted bot-to-user messaging like this:

The possibilities are endless, and you can always make updates as you innovate and implement new ideas.

How you would use a tool like SMS or Chatbots in your business is up to you.

The ultimate application is that finding innovative ways to communicate with your customer can yield positive results.

You just have to do the innovating yourself.

Conclusion

So whether you’re in middle school dance mode or are already into the beat, finding ways to sidle into a relationship and optimize your customer onboarding is just a good idea.

Remember that the seeds of churn or success are planted early. Whichever one grows is up to you.

Finding methods to create the perfect onboarding sequence varies greatly by industry and even client to client.

Just because it works for your buddy in Silicon Valley doesn’t mean it will work in your NYC startup.

Speak to knowledgeable people in your industry and bite the customer development bullet.

Search for flexible ways to adapt your onboarding experience.

It’s the best way to keep it productive and stop your funnel from leaking. Plus, it will keep your sales team busy.

Lastly, optimize the way you communicate.

Make your new customer feel valued but not overwhelmed.

You can even consider a new approach like SMS or live chat to create a new spin on your product or service.

Whatever you do, just make sure you get your onboarding right.

How do you create the perfect client onboarding experience?

About the Author: Neil Patel is the cofounder of Neil Patel Digital.

SearchCap: Google expands featured snippets, voice search ranking study & Rand Fishkin moves on

Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web.

From Search Engine Land:

Recent Headlines From Marketing Land, Our Sister Site Dedicated To Internet Marketing:

Search News From Around The Web:

The post SearchCap: Google expands featured snippets, voice search ranking study & Rand Fishkin moves on appeared first on Search Engine Land.



from SEO Rank Video Blog http://ift.tt/2FFLvMq
via IFTTT

Study: 11 voice search ranking factors analyzed

Backlinko has done an extensive analysis of “voice search ranking factors” and identified 11 variables tied to appearing in Google Home results. The company examined 10,000 results delivered over the smart speaker.

What Backlinko found was consistent with what many others have been saying but there were also a few surprises. For example, the study discounts the impact of Schema to some degree and page authority.

Here’s a partial, paraphrased list of the ranking factors:

  • PageSpeed is a significant factor; voice search results typically come from faster-loading pages.
  • Google relies heavily on very authoritative domains for results, but pages not as much.
  • Content that ranks well on the desktop tends to rank in voice search. This might be a correlation rather than causal however.
  • Shema may not be a factor: 36 percent of pages voice search results came from pages using Schema.
  • Roughly 41 percent of voice search results came from Featured Snippets.
  • Voice search results are generally 29 words; however Google sources voice results from long-form content.
  • HTTPS is critical.

Google has made page speed an explicit mobile ranking factor. Backlinko found that the page-load time for a voice result was almost 2X faster than traditional webpages. Not a surprise. What may be a surprise are the findings around Schema.

The company found that Schema was used on slightly more than a third of pages delivered over Google Home, somewhat more than in general results. Accordingly it discounted Schema as a voice search ranking factor:

Although voice search result pages tend to use Schema slightly more often than your average web page, the difference is not significant. Also, 63.6% of voice search results don’t use Schema at all.  Therefore, it’s unlikely that Schema has a direct impact on voice search rankings.

Below are Backlinko’s findings around Schema distribution in voice search results.

There are plenty of reasons to use Schema generally so this finding shouldn’t be seen as an argument against it. And many will question the validity of this finding. It may also be that Schema pages don’t appear more because they aren’t more prevalent and there are other important variables.

Among them, links matter for voice results as well. Domain authority was high but page authority was relatively low by comparison:

We discovered that the average Domain Rating of a voice search result was 76.8 . . . we found that the link authority of voice search result pages were significantly lower. In fact, the mean Page Rating of a voice search result was only 21.1.

Backlinko speculated that the voice algorithm was relying upon domain authority (over page authority) because that provided a higher level of confidence in the accuracy of results.

Long form content was also correlated with voice results. “Google voice search results predominately come from pages with a high word count,” the study asserts. In addition, “FAQ pages tend to perform particularly well in voice search.” Keywords were somewhat less important: “only 1.71% of voice search results use the exact keyword in their title tag.”

The company advises, “[D]on’t worry about creating individual pages that are each optimized around individual keywords. Instead, write in-depth content that can answer several different voice search queries on a single page.”

Finally, content that ranks well on the desktop appears to also rank well in voice results. This is logical. Nearly 75 percent of voice results on Google Home “came from a page ranking in the top 3 for that keyword.”

SEOs should review the post and do their own evaluations of the findings and recommendations.

While it’s not clear whether smart speakers will siphon off some query volume or merely be additive to the overall pie, at least two studies have shown that owners of Alexa and Google Home devices are spending somewhat less time with their smartphones.

Regardless, virtual assistants are emerging as an important consumer discovery tool and marketers need to take these platforms seriously and adapt accordingly. In Google’s case, the Assistant (which powers Google Home) is now available on 400 million devices.

The post Study: 11 voice search ranking factors analyzed appeared first on Search Engine Land.



from SEO Rank Video Blog http://ift.tt/2FEpGwp
via IFTTT

Unit economics: The foundation of a good SEM campaign

A strong understanding of the economics of any business unit is absolutely critical to any digital marketing campaign managed against non-brand key performance indicators (KPIs) in a search engine marketing (SEM) campaign.

One would think any reasonably large and successful business would have a good handle on their unit economics, and that this knowledge will be shared down the chain of command to the mid and lower levels of the marketing team.

But time and time again, I have found this critical foundation is missing, miscommunicated, insufficient or is so outdated as to make it worse than worthless.  “Worthless” in this case means that bad data does no actual harm. “Worse than worthless” means the utilization of the wrong KPI goals resulting in media waste and — more importantly — missed revenue and profit opportunity.

In other words, the company’s health is at actual risk because the marketing team and the business team aren’t on the same page.  In some cases, members of the marketing team may be working at cross-purposes, using incompatible KPIs and metrics.

Silos standing in the way of marketing AI?

I had the privilege of attending a lunch recently with members of the Direct Marketing Club of New York, the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), and other marketers, including MediaMath CEO Joe Zawadzki.

Although we attended the lunch to discuss the power of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to solve marketing problems, the consensus was many brands aren’t ready to empower decision-making with AI.

Their organizations were often so siloed that the inertia of departments and organization charts were a big factor slowing down the adoption of AI and machine learning in terms of optimizing marketing spend. A common theme across the table was the winners and disrupters in many industries are the ones without any legacy departmental structure. These included Tesla, the Dollar Shave Club, Casper & Purple, and even Amazon.

How does this all relate to pay-per-click (PPC) search engine marketing campaigns? Well, the influence of legacy structures affects your ability to grow yourself as a marketer and business person and directly influences your ability to communicate — with rational questions — up the chain of command (while following protocol), even if those communications might decrease your own departmental budget.

Rational questions for marketers to ask

Let’s use some common KPIs as examples of how things are often done now in SEM campaigns and how one might apply smarter business unit economics by asking some rational questions in the following scenarios:

PPC account (typically retail) managed by return on advertising spend (ROAS) with last click attribution

Rational questions to ask include:

  • Do we have any data that would predict which customers order more frequently?
  • Do we have any data on which variables in the PPC campaign tend to attract “new to file” customers vs. returning customers?
  • Do some categories of products have a significantly higher margin where a different ROAS KPI should be applied (so that the same dollar of spending generates more profit)?
  • Do certain products and their associated keywords result in higher lifetime customer value (LTV)? (The same question applies to geography, time of day, mobile vs desktop, etc.)
  • Should we deploy simple tests to understand the impact and attribution of other forms of paid and earned media (display, social, video/audio, etc.)? Any paid media that can be geo-targeted lends itself to such a test of incrementality. These kinds of tests often work better than attribution models that lack data points and are particularly important for search because often another marketing touch-point stimulates search behavior by the consumer. Therefore one can look not only at sales data but also at changes on brand search volume.  For example, if you double display spends in Albany, Denver, and Orlando, and both brand searches and sales happen to rise in those cities, you’ve isolated your interaction effect.  Do the same with any paid media you want to test.

PPC account managed based on last click attribution around cost per action (CPA) or lead gen

Not all businesses make the sale online, so marketing teams running campaigns used to generate leads and are given a cost-per-lead or CPA target to hit. Rational questions to ask include:

  • Are all leads we see equal? This issue goes beyond the “Glengarry Glen Ross” level of good leads and bad leads, encompassing both lead conversion rate to a sale and also the value of the sale (immediate), along with lifetime customer value.  Part of that LTV discussion could revolve around churn rates (think cell phone plans and subscriptions of all types, including product and services subscriptions).
  • Rather than the average cost per lead or CPA, can we be more nuanced in our optimization?

Fixed budget PPC account

Rational questions to ask include:

  • What’s the marginal contribution to the business originating from extra search, social or display media? Despite nearly all online media being auctioned off in near real-time, many larger organizations like to fix their spend by channel or category. This isn’t often the right strategy. To have a conversation about where the media dollars should be allocated, estimate the marginal cost of the next KPI unit in search, social and display.  Yes, you’ll need to address all the intricacies of the interaction effects between other media and search, but PPC search is very inelastic (small changes in bidding often don’t result in position and volume change, whereas in display, depending on whether it’s retargeted or otherwise targeted, the ability to “buy your KPI” may be easier.
  • Should we just add budget or take from another channel when we find opportunities? If you could buy dollar bills for $.90 (including the effort to do the transaction), would you cap your budget?  Of course not.  Neither should any business. Sometimes, when the KPI includes a LTV factor, there may be cash flow constraints that also have a time-value of money (it may take you a year to get your one dollar), but otherwise the more the better for “ninety cent dollar bills!”

There’s probably another column that could be written on the nuances of applying unit economics to marketing, but this should give you a solid start toward a good SEM campaign.

The post Unit economics: The foundation of a good SEM campaign appeared first on Search Engine Land.



from SEO Rank Video Blog http://ift.tt/2FdSBtu
via IFTTT

Multifaceted featured snippets begin rolling out in Google search results

Google has been rolling out many new search features over the past few months related to images, featured snippets, and the knowledge graph. Today the search giant released another feature called “multifaceted featured snippets.”

Multifaceted featured snippets will be surfaced for queries that are sufficiently broad enough to allow for more than one interpretation of what was submitted. In these instances, the SERP returned will include more than one featured snippet, with the original query rewritten as the questions the algorithm assumes the user may have intended, and the results displayed in the multifaceted snippet will reflect those new questions.

From the announcement:

There are several types of nuanced queries where showing more comprehensive results could be helpful. We’re starting first with “multi-intent” queries, which are queries that have several potential intentions or purposes associated. The query “tooth pain after a filling,” for example, could be interpreted as “why does my tooth still hurt after a filling?” or “how long should a tooth hurt after a filling?”

For example:

Google Multifaceted Featured Snippet

Multifaceted Featured Snippets vs. Multi-Perspective Answers

Back in December, Bing began rolling out AI-powered multi-perspective answers as part of its “Intelligent Search” set of new features, which includes Intelligent Answers, Intelligent Image Search and Conversational Search. Multi-perspective answers are just one of the “Intelligent Answers” features that has been live since the rollout. These results surface two (or more) authoritative sources on a topic, and will typically include differing perspectives/answers to the query.

Bing leverages its deep recurrent neural network models to determine similarity and sentiment among authoritative sources, and extracts the multiple viewpoints related to a topic — providing the most relevant set of multi-perspective answers (covered in more detail here).

Bing – Multi-perspective Intelligent Answers

Google’s multifaceted featured snippets may appear not too dissimilar from Bing’s multi-perspective answers, in that they also provide multiple rich results for a single query, but they are instead based on the presumed multiple intentions of a query (resulting in both multiple queries and results) vs. multiple viewpoints resulting from a single query. With these types of broad queries, many interpretations of what the user is actually asking can exist.

Multifaceted snippets aim to provide a more comprehensive and actionable set of results for these multi-intent query scenarios. They differ from multi-perspective intelligent answers in that they presume a different question might be being asked altogether, and surface responses for each of the queries the algorithm assumes the user may have actually intended, as the screenshot below demonstrates:

Multifaceted Featured Snippet

Google plans to expand multifaceted featured snippets throughout 2018 to include other nuanced query types — beyond those that could have multiple intentions — and lists guidance-seeking queries as one example.

From the post:

“For example, guidance-seeking queries like “is it worth fixing my foundation?” have several components that could be important, such as cost, duration, methods and financing. We’ll continue to experiment with multifaceted featured snippets over this year to expand coverage.”

With both Google and Bing having fully adopted deep learning methods and using artificial neural networks to drive search advancements, we can expect to see a steady stream of changes in search results enhancements and improved information discovery.

As always, Google encourages users to submit feedback on these new search features as you encounter them in the SERPs. Read Google’s full announcement here.

The post Multifaceted featured snippets begin rolling out in Google search results appeared first on Search Engine Land.



from SEO Rank Video Blog http://ift.tt/2oIoVe2
via IFTTT

Rand Fishkin leaves Moz, announces a new start-up

Rand Fishkin, the co-founder of Moz, announced his new company after officially leaving his day-to-day operations at Moz yesterday. He is starting a company named SparkToro, a technology platform in the influencer and audience intelligence marketing space.

Fishkin started the well-known SEO platform over a decade ago with his mother, Gillian. In fact, he dropped out of college to make the company now known as Moz about 17 years ago. Last July we learned he was leaving Moz after stepping down as CEO back in 2014.

Fishkin described his departure from Moz as a four out of 10 on a scale of zero to 10 where zero is “fired and escorted out of the building by security” and where 10 is “left entirely of his own accord on wonderful terms.” He wrote:

That makes today a hard one, cognitively and emotionally. I have a lot of sadness, a heap of regrets, and a smattering of resentment too. But I am, deeply, deeply thankful to all the people who supported me and Moz over the last two decades. The experience of building a company like this, of helping to change and mature an industry, of learning so much about entrepreneurship, marketing, and myself has been an honor and a privilege.

Fishkin said he still owns about 24 percent of Moz in outstanding shares, is still on Moz’s board of directors as the chairperson and remains the single largest shareholder. Because of his stake and the people there, Fishkin says he wants to see Moz succeed and continue to do well.

You can read more about Fishkin’s thoughts on leaving and his future plans on his new blog.

The post Rand Fishkin leaves Moz, announces a new start-up appeared first on Search Engine Land.



from SEO Rank Video Blog http://ift.tt/2F9205B
via IFTTT

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

SearchCap: Google right to be forgotten, Google Word Coach game & German ruling

Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web.

From Search Engine Land:

Recent Headlines From Marketing Land, Our Sister Site Dedicated To Internet Marketing:

Search News From Around The Web:

The post SearchCap: Google right to be forgotten, Google Word Coach game & German ruling appeared first on Search Engine Land.



from SEO Rank Video Blog http://ift.tt/2t3I937
via IFTTT

Announcing the Newest Kissmetrics Connection: Facebook Audiences

Kissmetrics Populations lets you track key segments of your user base. In just a few steps, you can track user activity, marketing performance, and product engagement.

And now we’re making it even better.

With our latest iteration, you can connect a Population to a Facebook Custom Audience for even greater targeting and tracking in Kissmetrics.

Let’s see how it works.

The Facebook Custom Audiences <> Kissmetrics Populations Connection

Facebook Audiences is an advertising product from Facebook that lets marketers advertise to existing customers. As long as you have email addresses, you can advertise to that group on Facebook through Audiences.

Here’s where Kissmetrics Populations comes in.

If you’re using Kissmetrics and identifying your users by their email, you can turn a Population into an Audience on Facebook that you can then advertise to.

Let’s say you’re an eCommerce company and have created a Population for the one and done buyers – the people that made their first purchase 6 months ago but haven’t made one since. Here’s how that Population may look:

We see that there are 2,983 people in this Population. If we scroll down, we’ll see the users email addresses:

These customers are ripe for a new advertising campaign. We’ll create an advertisement on Facebook that offers them 10% back off their next purchase.

So, with this Population in our hand, we’ll move over in Kissmetrics and click on the Connections tab and Authorize the Facebook connection:

And just like that, you have your new Custom Audience in Facebook. And the best part is that it will automatically update when new people enter the Population, or people leave the Population. So if you get a user who was in this Population and advertise to them and they come back and make a purchase, they’ll automatically be removed from the Population in Kissmetrics, which will update the Custom Audience in Facebook.

3 Populations You Can Create Right Now

Populations are a great fit for eCommerce stores. Here’s 3 Populations you can create right now:

1. The “Browsers”

These are the groups of people who continually visit your eCommerce store, but never actually make a purchase. Keeping track of this Population will help you know how well your site is converting prospects, as well as how many people are just browsing without buying. In many cases, this may indicate how many people are price shopping your store.

Keep in mind that you will have to have that person’s email address before you can move them to a custom audience in Facebook. In many cases, a person will give you their email address for signing up for an email newsletter. You can promote something like “10% off your first purchase when you sign up for our newsletter” and you’ll probably get a barrage of new emails to your list. Once you have that, you can then track the browsers and advertise to them on Facebook.

2. Customers That Haven’t Purchased After X Amount of Days

Since most eCommerce stores don’t have a recurring revenue model, they need customers coming back to purchase. Many stores incentivize this through loyalty programs. With Populations, you can track how many customers haven’t purchased from you after a certain amount of time. Then you’ll connect that Population to Facebook and advertise to those customers to win them back and earn a repurchase.

3. Lost Loyalists

Loyal customers are great. They keep your business alive and thriving. So needless to say, you don’t want to lose them. But, it’s inevitable that some of your loyal customers will be moving some of their purchases to other stores. That’s why you’ll want to keep track of how many of these “lost loyalists” you’ve had over the months.

Log in to Start Using Populations

If you’re a Kissmetrics customer, you can login and start using the new Populations <> Facebook integration. If you have any questions, you can reach out to our support team and we’ll be more than happy to help you.

If you aren’t a Kissmetrics customer but would like to learn more, you can request a demo.

Don’t Miss Out on other Connections

Connections go beyond Facebook.

If you use Slack, you can use our Populations connection to stay on top of all your Populations without having to logging into Facebook.

Our HubSpot connection will enrich any customer profile in Hubspot with data from Kissmetrics.

And we have many more connections coming. Stay tuned to this blog for future product announcements.

How Amazon dominates the competitive search landscape

This report from Adthena reveals the extent to which Amazon has been capturing text ad click share in major retail categories.

Analysis of consumer electronics, and department store retail categories in the US and UK, suggests that Amazon’s paid search ad spend is behind the e-commerce giant’s continued market growth, with the scale and impact of their paid search investments eclipsing their closest rivals.

Featured in this report:

  • What is Amazon’s share of ad spend in US/UK markets?
  • How much click share does this win them?
  • What are the three key factors which contribute to Amazon’s dominant search performance?
  • What are the tactics and strategies retailers can use to get more click share?

Visit Digital Marketing Depot to download “How Amazon Dominates the Competitive Search Landscape.”

The post How Amazon dominates the competitive search landscape appeared first on Search Engine Land.



from SEO Rank Video Blog http://ift.tt/2CnjpXv
via IFTTT

Can you predict what the future holds for your inbound links?

Almost five years ago I wrote an article about predicting a site’s future and using your expectation to decide whether you should pursue links on that site today. Much has changed in the search engine optimization (SEO) landscape since then so I decided to expand and update my original article.

Sometimes, what’s old is old

It’s interesting to run into sites we’ve worked with in the past and compare their previous and current metrics. Lots of things pop up like:

  • Old links are still live but the host page is full of new links whereas it wasn’t before.
  • Pages that once ranked well no longer do so.
  • Articles with links that were not originally there have been added.
  • And sometimes everything is the same, though, if not better!

A look into the past

It’s easy to determine what a site looked like in the past and compare it to the current site by using Archive.org.

You may notice a lot of changes such as good and bad redesigns, deleted links and entire articles removed. Occasionally you may notice whole sites deindexed in Google:

Due diligence

When starting a link campaign, it is important to go through a number of steps or perform “due diligence” using checklists and guidelines you’ve established.

It may be impossible to check every page but try to do as much as possible so nothing is overlooked. Here are some issues to check for:

  • Is the site indexed in Google?
  • Are there any spammy hacks on the site that haven’t been fixed?
  • Is there contact info on the site?
  • Does the site rank for its brand and major keywords?
  • If you’re placing a link in an existing piece of content, does that page rank for its title?
  • Is the site free from links and ads for gambling, payday loans, drugs, and porn?
  • Have you checked to make sure the content is original and not scraped or duplicated?
  • And always, always…does it look like your link would be a natural fit and get clicked on here?

There’s more depending on the industry and individual website but notice it’s pretty uncomplicated common sense stuff.

So how in the world can you predict what’s going to happen after you finish working on the site?

How do you know the webmaster won’t fill the site up with spam, sell the domain, let it expire or sell the site to a private blog network?

There tend to be signs, both good and bad.  Let’s start with the bad signs.

Bad signs

Here are a few red flags to look for when negotiating for link placement:

  • The webmaster gives you a list of 50 other “great” sites he has.  While some people just own a lot of sites, it is doubtful the other 50 will be as good as the one you sought out.  Look carefully.
  • The webmaster asks if you mind if he gives your information to “friends” who own similar websites. Watch for heavy interlinking with the friend sites — they may possibly even be owned by the same person who’s just using aliases.
  • Traffic on a site has dipped dramatically in the past, even if it’s good now. If the dip was five years ago and everything has been good since then it should be OK but if you see lots of dips, especially in the past few years, that may be a sign a new drop will happen soon.
  • They openly advertise that they sell text links.  Big red flag here; you do not want to work with a site that is basically asking for a Google penalty.

Good signs

Now let’s look at a couple factors that distinguish sites where links live for years and everything is still looking great.

  • Traffic is fairly steady (or continues to increase) through the years with no major dips.
  • Articles are well-written, guest or sponsored posts are identified as such and don’t appear to be full of someone else’s links.

Notice the good list is shorter than the bad list. That’s because you never know what will happen. Is everyone going to eventually get hit in some way since the algorithm changes constantly? Maybe.

Disavow madness

Don’t forget some people disavow like crazy, and they don’t just disavow single webpages — they disavow entire domains, because it’s easier.

I know of sites who want to disavow upwards of 75% of their links when they don’t even have a penalty or they haven’t been negatively impacted by an algorithmic change!

Honestly, when it comes to links, anything can happen. You never know when a site will be penalized, and it’s possible for them to get caught in a wide net and not deserve it. I’ve seen unfair penalties many times and seen sites suddenly drop in rankings and never get back to where they once were, even if they did nothing wrong.

You can’t predict what will happen in link building or SEO. You can make some very educated guesses but change is the only thing you can really guarantee.

The post Can you predict what the future holds for your inbound links? appeared first on Search Engine Land.



from SEO Rank Video Blog http://ift.tt/2otCMFC
via IFTTT

An easy way to see if Google thinks your webpages are keyword relevant

We all want to rank well, but there are times when it seems nearly impossible to do so.

There can be many causes for rankings shortfalls, and as I pointed out recently, sometimes it seems Google is just not interested in ranking businesses like yours for a target query.

That can be frustrating for anyone which is why my previous article suggested a way to determine if your target keyword phrase was a good fit for the terms you want to rank for.

Sometimes it’s better to pursue keyword phrases for which you know have a better chance of ranking than those you want to rank for.

In today’s post, I’m going to talk about factors Google may use to determine if a site is reasonably relevant for the keywords it targets.

Creating a webpage is not enough

Just because you create webpages targeting a certain keyword phrase or in a specific topic area does not mean you will rank for those terms.  In short, we don’t know if Google is “buying” it.

Let’s set the context here:

  1. You want to rank for a specific search phrase but currently, do not.
  2. Google is ranking your competitors’ content in the top ten search engine result pages (SERPs) but not yours.
  3. You want to know if Google thinks your webpage is a potential (relevant) fit.

Now that we have an outline, let’s dig in.

Ranking analysis

One of the best ways to see the ranking potential for a webpage is to see what it already ranks for.

This sounds simple and obvious, but I’m going to take it a bit deeper than simply looking at the top keywords to your site.

It’s worth digging a bit deeper to see what insights we can get, not only by looking at what we rank for, but what the competition ranks for, and the makeup of the words in those phrases.

The first step is to pull the phrases you currently rank for.

Getting Search Term Data from SEMRush

Once you have the basic ranking data, the next step is to manipulate the data to find additional keyword sets.

To do this, we’re going to focus on the phrases our site ranks for (in the top ten) and then count of all the individual words included with those keyword phrases.

Let’s say you want to rank for “manufacturer’s blue widgets”. The end result should look something like this:

Example Search Query Data for a Site

Now, repeat the process for your competitors ranking for the target phrase “manufacturer’s blue widgets”. When you’re done, it should look something like this:

Search Query Data That Shows That You Have a Long Way to Go

At this point, we have a lot of information which tells us what Google thinks about your site, or not.

Do you show up for a number of related phrases?  If yes, then your target keyword is probably fairly possible for you to rank for, even if you don’t currently show up in the top 50 for that target. If you’re ranking for related words, Google at least sees you as being relevant.

Scenario #1, we need help

But there’s a problem with the data showing above. Notice how the site on the left is ranking only for keywords that include the company’s brand name.

This is not good since we are trying to rank for the phrase “manufacturer’s blue widgets” and that term is nowhere to be found.  This tells us Google doesn’t equate this website with our target phrase.  Ouch!

If you don’t see your target keywords showing in the search results that may be a sign ranking is going to be tough. You either have major content problems related to the target keyword or a general authority problem related to the topic area.

Scenario #2 much better

Let’s take a look at a scenario where our prospects are better:

Search Query Data That Shows That Your Prospects are Good

The data shows we’re in much better shape, and our prospects are reasonably good.

Tuning and tweaking

If you find you rank for a number of related terms, your next steps are pretty straightforward. You should look to improve the content related to the target page on your site by improving the depth of supporting content on other pages of your site.

You may also need to do some public relations (PR) or related link building that supports your stance as a relevant resource.  The scope of this effort is along the lines of tuning and tweaking, not a complete overhaul.

When to do an overhaul

If you didn’t rank for much in the way of related terms, the steps you need to take are basically the same as tuning and tweaking but with more intensity.  You need an overhaul because Google just doesn’t look at your pages as being relevant to the topic/phrase.

This means the program is going to cost significantly more to execute, and it will take longer to show results. If you don’t have the budget or patience for that, you may need to consider a different keyword target.

Some cost perspective

Let’s put this in perspective and see what each scenario may cost you.

In the first scenario where you didn’t rank for any relevant terms, the work involved to rank may cost $250K, and you might have to campaign for ten to twelve months to see the results you’re looking for.

In the second scenario, you rank for relevant terms so your costs to continue ranking or rank ahead might be $50K and might take three to four months to achieve results.

The analysis is actually fairly simple, but the benefits are high. When Google relates keywords to your webpages, your search engine optimization (SEO) costs should be lower.

Focusing on what you already rank for allows you to budget more accurately for your campaigns, and to focus on tactics to help you achieve your goals.

The post An easy way to see if Google thinks your webpages are keyword relevant appeared first on Search Engine Land.



from SEO Rank Video Blog http://ift.tt/2FzTVEO
via IFTTT